EarthquakeAdvisor.Com Logo EarthquakeAdvisor.com logo
EarthquakeAdvisor.Com
 Home       Find Services        Products        Financial Help        Safety        Features     
Web This Site

email this page to a friend
printable page

 products
  & services
 find a contractor
 find an engineer
 find an inspector
 get insurance
 get a mortgage
 business recovery/ continuity planning
 other services
 buy a survival kit
 other products
get listed on
earthquakeadvisor.com


have any suggestions, questions or comments about this site?

Evaluation of Manufactured Housing Support System Performance in the Loma Prieta Earthquake

Detailed Evaluation

<< Methodology Conclusion >>

Following the initial assessment, as time permitted, Division staff conducted a more detailed evaluation of 12 of the parks where damage was heaviest. Within these 12 parks were 479, or 81%, of the 592 homes down. These 12 parks were:

SAN BENITO

1. The Mission Oaks Mobilehome Park with 225 spaces and 120 homes down had homes installed with the following types of support systems:
 

Total
Not
Down

Down
%
Failure
Steel Piers 75 14 61 81%
Concrete Piers 39 21 18 46%
Concrete Bock111 70 4137%
22510512053%
 
Five (5) homes within this park were equipped with Earthquake Resistant Bracing Systems (ERBS) and each performed without failure.
 
2. The Hollister Park with 10 spaces and 7 homes down had homes installed with the following types of support systems:
 

Total
Not
Down

Down
%
Failure
Steel Piers 6 0 6 100%
Concrete Piers 0 0 0 0%
Concrete Bock4 3 125%
103770%
 
3. The Country Trailer Estates with 4 spaces and 1 home down had homes installed with the following types of support systems:
 
Steel Piers4 3 1 25%
Concrete Piers 0 0 0 0%
Concrete Bock0000%
43125%

SANTA CLARA

4. Dalys Mobilehome Park with 24 spaces and 1 home down had homes installed with the following types of support systems.
 

Total
Not
Down

Down
%
Failure
Steel Piers242314%
Concrete Piers0000%
Concrete Bock0000%
242314%

SANTA CRUZ

5. Rancho Cerritos with 144 spaces and 92 homes down had homes installed on the following types of support systems:
 

Total
Not
Down

Down
%
Failure
Steel Piers33112267%
Concrete Piers106386864%
Concrete Bock53240%
144529264%
 
Thirteen (13) homes in the park had ERBS and each one performed without failure.
 
6. The Pinto Lake Estates with 174 spaces and 82 homes down had homes installed on the following types of support systems:
 
Steel Piers85355059%
Concrete Piers73423142%
Concrete Bock161516%
174928247%
 
Four (4) homes in the park had ERBS and each one performed without failure.
 
7. The Monterey Vista Estates with 122 spaces and 70 homes down had homes installed on the following types of support systems:
 
Steel Piers87276069%
Concrete Piers2718933%
Concrete Bock87113%
122527057%
 
Fifteen (15) homes in the park were equipped with ERBS and each one performed without failure.
 
8. The Green Valley Estates with 105 spaces had 57 homes down and had homes installed on the following types of support systems:
 
Steel Piers36152158%
Concrete Piers66313553%
Concrete Bock32133%
105485754%
 
Two (2) homes in this park were installed on ERBS and each one performed without failure.
 
9. The Colonial Manor with 71 spaces had 8 homes down and had homes installed on the following types of support systems.
 
Steel Piers53240%
Concrete Piers494548%
Concrete Bock1715212%
7163811%
 
Three homes in this park were installed on ERBS and each one performed without failure.
 
10. The Meadow Manor with 276 spaces had 14 homes down and had homes installed on the following types of support systems:
Steel Piers10010100%
Concrete Piers000N/A
Concrete Bock26626242%
276262145%
 
11. The Old Mill Mobilehome Park with 39 spaces had 14 homes down and had homes installed on the following types of support systems:
 
Steel Piers000N/A
Concrete Piers32201238%
Concrete Bock75229%
39251436%
 
Four (4) homes in the park were equipped with ERBS and each one performed without failure.
 
12. The Freedom Mobilehome Park with 45 spaces had 13 homes down and had homes installed on the following types of support systems:
 
Steel Piers92778%
Concrete Piers3125619%
Concrete Bock5500%
45321329%

The above represents a 0% failure rate of Earthquake Resistant Bracing Systems; a 64% failure rate for steel piers; a 43% failure rate for concrete piers; and, a 12% failure rate for concrete block. There was an unusual occurrence of the failure of concrete block in the Mission Oaks Mobilehome Park in San Benito County. Division inspectors returned to the park to look for a possible cause and found that the majority of concrete block support systems in the park were of lightweight (ornamental) concrete block rather than the conventional 8" X 8" X 16" building (structural) concrete block.

The figure below is representative of a failed block support system.

failed block support system

Although fewer than 4% of the homes in these 12 parks were equipped with Earthquake Resistant Bracing Systems (ERBS), their performance without failure is worthy of additional note. An ERBS is not designed to prevent damage or to prevent the home from being displaced from its pier or block support system, the ERBS is designed to reduce damage to the home. In each instance where homes were found to be equipped with ERBS the system performed as designed.

The HCD certified ERBS is designed to limit the fall of a home from its support system to a maximum of two inches (2'). Following an earthquake, homes equipped with ERBS may still have to be reinstalled upon their support systems. However, the reinstallation is greatly simplified since the home has not fallen completely to the ground and has not suffered significant structural damage. Homes with ERBS in the Loma Prieta earthquake, although their primary support systems had failed, were stable and were continued to be occupied.

While order, non-certified, and home-made ERBS reduced damage to homes on which they were installed, these devices did not perform as well as the newer certified devices. HCD is pleased with the industry support for the rigid certification standards and with the performance of the devices now that performance has been confirmed by more than the engineering theory initially applied in the certification program. HCD is also pleased that no performance conditions were observed of certified ERBS in the Loma Prieta earthquake that would necessitate a change in our regulations for certification.

In early 1990 HCD will be implementing legislation signed by the Governor in 1989 requiring a permit and inspection of each installation of an ERBS. This permit and inspection process will provide additional assurance to homeowners that the ERBS has been properly installed on their home.

The figure below is of a home with a failed primary support system and a functioning ERBS.

failed primary support system
<< Methodology Conclusion >>





Back to the Top

Home  |  Find Services  |  Products  |  Financial Help  |  Safety  |  Features
Terms of Use
Copyright © 2002-2005 EarthquakeAdvisor.Com, All Rights Reserved.
All names and trademarks are the property of their respective companies.